critical-decision-making-for-providers-9

View the scenario called “Critical Decision Making for Providers” found in the Allied Health Community media (https://lc.gcumedia.com/hlt307v/allied-health-community/home.html).

In a 750‐1,200 word paper, describe the scenario involving Mike, the lab technician, and answer the following questions:

  1. What were the consequences of a failure to report?
  2. What impact did his decision have on patient safety, on the risk for litigation, on the organization’s quality metrics, and on the workload of other hospital departments?
  3. As Mike’s manager, what will you do to address the issue with him and ensure other staff members do not repeat the same mistakes?

A minimum of three academic references from credible sources are required for this assignment.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

for-chemtai-11

According to the assigned case study, Consolidated Electric was faced with an inventory level v. customer service tradeoff. Review the assigned case materials provided and answer the following questions:

  1. Design an inventory control system for this business. Provide the formulas that you would use for a P System, Q system or other system you design. Compare these to the formulas currently used. Examine the data from the Appendix to note any peculiarities in demand that your system might encounter. What would you do about them?
  2. Describe how the system you have designed will help the company meet customer-service and cost objectives

Instructions:

  • Label your Word document as follows: yourlastname.doc (ex: Johnson.docx)
  • The paper should be at least 1,000-words
  • The paper should be APA-compliant paper comprising your response
  • Minimum 5 full pages of content (Word Document) of strategic material (does not include cover page, abstract, nor reference pages)
  • All charts, graphs, pictures are to go in the appendix (not a substitute for content)
  • The paper must provide inline citations to at least five scholarly sources supporting your paper

answer-the-following-question-138

choose one of the following terms for your research for Journal Article Summary 4: economies of scale, economies of scope, global companies, global teams, globalization strategy, international division, joint venture, multi-domestic strategy, multinational stage, or standardization.

Instructions

Journal Article Summary & Discussion:

Within each module, there is a list of key terms. Each student will select one of the key terms and conduct a search of Campbellsville University’s online Library resources to find 1 recent peer reviewed article (within the past 3 years) that closely relate to the concept. Your submission must include the following information in the following format:-

DEFINITION: a brief definition of the key term followed by the APA reference for the term; this does not count in the word requirement.

SUMMARY: Summarize the article in your own words-this should be in the 150-200-word range. Be sure to note the article’s author, note their credentials and why we should put any weight behind his/her opinions, research or findings regarding the key term.

DISCUSSION: Using 300-350 words, write a brief discussion, in your own words of how the article relates to the selected weekly reading assignment Key Term. A discussion is not rehashing what was already stated in the article, but the opportunity for you to add value by sharing your experiences, thoughts and opinions. This is the most important part of the assignment.

REFERENCES: All references must be listed at the bottom of the submission–in APA format. Be sure to use the headers in your submission to ensure that all aspects of the assignment are completed as required.

Any form of plagiarism, including cutting and pasting, will result in zero points for the entire assignment.

q-1-explain-how-following-a-network-based-structure-is-advantageous-to-amazon-in-terms-of-conducting-its-business-activities-support-your-answer-by-using-two-examples-from-this-case-study-2-5-marks-lo-1-6-amp-2-2

i-need-help-with-this-bio-lab-131-its-about-meiosis-they-are-2-activities

We will cover only

activities 1 and 2

here.

Activity 1 is very similar to the mitosis activity you did last week. All you need

to do is use the power point and pg189 to describe meiosis

Meiosis actually consists of two rounds of cell division which are depicted in

the next two slides for you to reference

Meiosis is the process by which sex cell (egg and sperm cells) are generated.

During this process homologous chromosomes are separated and resulting in

genetically diverse sex cells

The assignment

Either print this power point out, write your answers on it, scan it and upload it

Or type (or write) your answers clearly in a separate document and upload

Or clearly submit a text entry on canvas

Include activities 1 and 2 as one submission together please

Please upload or enter your assignment onto Canvas (

note i attache to you the homeowrk and other stuff maybe will helps u

types-of-loans-1

Types of Loans

What are the four major types of loans made by U.S. commercial banks? What are the basic distinguishing characteristics of each type of loan?

frankenstein-critical-analysis-evaluation-essay-4-2

Assignment Instructions: Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay

Note: Please review the source guidelines below very carefully. If you do not choose from the provided sources below, this will cause a grading delay and you will need to resubmit the assignment.

For this assignment, you will write your evaluation essay. You are required to submit only your final draft for this assignment (though we encourage all students to take advantage of the additional feedback a draft can provide). Use the grader’s feedback and the rubric to make revisions to your draft before submitting the final. Your second draft will be graded.

Now that you have completed Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, you are in a good position to consider what critics have written about the novel. You will need a total of two critiques (also known as critical analysis essays) for this assignment.

First, use the selection of links below to locate a critical analysis essay written about the 1818 version of Mary Shelley’s novel. You may focus most of your attention on this first critique. If the author of your critique is not specified, focus on the publication of the critique.

Choose from among these sources:

The questions in the study guides should have helped you evaluate this criticism in your head. Now it’s time to write it down!

Your evaluation may go more smoothly if you approach the guiding questions in this order:

Evaluate the critic/author:

Who wrote the criticism you read? What credentials does the author have? (If you are using a valid source, you should be able to find these easily)

Find the thesis of the article:

What is the thesis of the critical article you’ve chosen? What point does the author want to make about Frankenstein?

Evaluate the thesis:

Do you agree with this thesis? Why or why not? We’ve covered many ideas in the study guides. Can you find points within the guides that support your agreement or disagreement with the critical writer(s)? Look for new supporting information rather than revisiting the same ones the critics have chosen.

Evaluate the support:

Whether you agree or disagree with the thesis, does the critic provide sufficient research from the text and outside references to make a strong case? What does the article have for support from the text or outside sources? In your opinion, what makes these references valid? Do you feel the author uses this support properly?

Next, locate a second critique about the novel that includes ideas somewhat similar (genre classification, for instance) to any of the discussions you have in your essay. The second critique can either support or refute any of the claims in your paper. The objective of this portion of the essay is to further support your opinion of the primary critic’s thesis or support. Therefore, for example, if you choose a secondary article that refutes any of your claims, you will need to counteract those ideas to bring the focus of your essay back in alignment with your essay’s thesis (your personal opinion of how the primary critic is either correct or incorrect in his or her thesis claim and/or how the first critic is either effective or ineffective in his or her support). Every discussion in this essay should ultimately support the claim you make in your thesis.

For instance, if the first critic argues that Shelley’s writing is juvenile, and if you agree, does the second critic also support this thesis? How so? If the second critic does not support your assessment of the first critic’s thesis, what evidence can you use from the text to argue that the second critic is incorrect? Consider another example: if the first critic believes the novel is autobiographical, and if you disagree, does the second critic help you argue your own view of the first critic’s thesis? If so, how? Perhaps the second critic disagrees with your view and feels the novel is autobiographical– if that’s the case, be prepared to use evidence from the text to refute the second critic’s thesis and support your own argument. Using two critiques in this way will allow you to create a polished, comprehensive Evaluation Essay that allows you to connect your own ideas to those of seasoned critics.

In addition to addressing each of the evaluative components above, develop your essay so it has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. You must include an evaluative thesis statement in both the introduction and the conclusion. Ensure that each of your claims is supported with valid evidence from the literary criticism you have chosen; the novel, Frankenstein; and/or the study guides.

Using proper MLA style, insert parenthetical citations for all borrowed information in addition to a Works Cited page for Frankenstein and your chosen literary critiques; you are not required to cite the study guides if you use them.

Helpful Hints: For a thesis statement, try answering a question like: How and how well does this piece of criticism state and support its argument regarding Frankenstein?

You might use these as possible guidelines in crafting your thesis statement:
(Critic, aka author of the critique) uses (add critic title) to (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) by (explain why and/or include your support).
OR
(Critic)’s (add critique title) (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) because (explain why and/or include your support).

More specific thesis examples:

John Smith uses “Frankenstein Critique Essay” to adequately argue that Victor’s mother created the first monster by coddling Victor as a boy.
OR
John Smith’s “Frankenstein Critique Essay” does not effectively argue that Victor’s mother created the first monster because the novel Frankenstein too strongly supports inherent good or bad, which means nurturing roles cannot be held responsible.

The guidelines for this assignment are:

Length: This assignment should be a minimum of 3 typed pages or at least 750 words.

Header: Include a header in the upper left-hand corner of your writing assignment with the following information:

  • Your first and last name
  • Course Title (Composition II)
  • Assignment name (Evaluation Essay, Writing Assignment 4)
  • Current Date

Format:

  • MLA-style source documentation and Works Cited
  • Your last name and page number in the upper-right corner of each page
  • Double-spacing throughout
  • Standard font (TimesNewRoman, Calibri)
  • Title, centered after heading
  • 1” margins on all sides
  • Save the file using one of the following extensions: .docx, .doc, .rtf, or .txt

Underline your thesis statement in the introductory paragraph.

Reminder: You need at least two critiques in addition to the novel in Works Cited in order to receive the highest score. In other words, you need three sources total in cited in the essay and on the Works Cited page in order to earn the maximum points in the corresponding column on the grading rubric. Failure to meet the source minimum will result in a severe decrease in your grade.

small-section-of-report

use apa format

the idea of the report is that you are moving the Jacksonville Jaguar to London

the only part you must do is the CHOSEN MODE OF ENTRY

The modes of entry a company can choose to enter a foreign market to expand sales, acquire resources, and minimize risks include the following: exporting, turnkey operations, licensing, franchising, joint ventures, greenfield ventures, and acquisitions. Each of these options has advantages and disadvantages as well as opportunities and risks

describe in detail

aoj-200-actus-reas-and-volunariness

** Total work should be around 300 – 400 word count**

**will provide the ebook link with login information when connected with a tutor**

Read “You Decide 4.2” on page 79 (78 in the 4th edition) of your textbook.

watch the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z62LBLyut7Q

Then answer the question at the end of 4.2, “Do you agree with the court?”

You won’t be able to see any other posts until you post your first time. Then you’ll be able to read other students’ posts.

After posting your answer, read my post. My post contains the main argument of the appellate court when they ruled in this case. Did your opinion match that of the appellate court?