What is the economic limit?

Question 1:

Explain the reserves classification system shown in the figure below.

Question 2:

You have a lease that is currently producing at 1,300 BOPD. It is expected to continue producing at this rate for 19 months and then decline at a rate of 30% per year (we would sometimes say that this is a loss ratio of 0.3). We have the following additional information:

 

Oil Price………………………………………………………………….. $28.00/bbl

Total Production Tax……………………………………………. 18% of Revenue

Royalty Interest………………………………………………………………… 20%

Operating Cost…………………………………………………….. $67,500/month

Your Working Interest……………………………………………………….. 100%

 

Consider only production taxes (ignore income or other taxes).

 

  1. Determine the operator’s next income for the first year.
  2. Determine the gross production in the second year.
  3. When the lease is on decline, the monthly exponential decline, the monthly exponential decline fraction is ____?
  4. What is the producing rate at the end of the third year?
  5. Determine the gross production in the third year.
  6. What is the economic limit?
  7. At what time does the lease reach its economic limit?
  8. What is the EUR (estimated ultimate recovery)?
  9. Over the life of the lease, what is the net income for the royalty owner?
  10. Over the life of the well, how much is paid in production taxes?

4MAT Book review on Integrative approaches to psychology and Christianity

4MAT book review on: Integrative approaches to psychology and Christianity:An introduction to worldview issues, philosophical foundations and models of integration.By David N. Entwistle

2-Pg Summary- Be appropriately concise but also be adequately complete in your ideas. Prove that you comprehend the main ideas by writing a clear and succinct summary. The summary is not a commentary or listing of topics but rather a discussion of the core ideas (main ideas) in the entire book. Cite the book in-text at least once per paragraph and include page numbers for direct quotations.

1-pg Concrete Response-In approximately 1 page, write about a personal life episode that this book triggered in your memory. Relate your story in first person, describing action and quoting exact words you remember hearing or saying. In the teaching style of Jesus, this is your own parable, case study, or personal connection to the main ideas of the book. Your comments in this section need to be clearly tied to main points from the book, not tangential ideas. Connect your comments to the main points for the reader.

1-pg Reflection – This section is a short critique or evaluation of the author’s main ideas; include positives/negatives and strengths/weaknesses. You should consider new questions that arose for you in response to what you have read and explore concerns, implications, etc.

1-pg Action – What are you going to do about it? Develop action steps based on the core points of the book. This section must be a description of how the main ideas will affect your counseling. What professional changes will you implement and share with others? Be precise in summarizing your action steps and clearly connect your action steps to main points from the book.

In sum, after having read Entwistle per my suggestions, you should be able to explain the following in your paper:
The concept of truth: both psychology and theology seek truth—why have they been enemies in the past, and why do some counselors still see them as enemies?; how do to the two systems seek truth differently?; what epistemology does each system accept/reject?; how can each discipline contribute to truth in ways that the other may not be able to?; why is “all truth is God’s truth” an important tenant in the Christian worldview?; what is meant by the “two books”?
Why is the concept of worldview so important to both psychologists and theologians? What are the implications to counseling for a therapist’s worldview?
What are the main elements of the models of integration? What are the implications for integration (and counseling) if one identifies with one model over another?

Teachings of the Catholic Church

Pope St.John Paul II describes Theology in this way: “Theology is structured as an understanding of faith in the light of a two gold methodological principle: the auditus fidei and the intellectus fidei With the first, theology makes it own the content of Revelation as this has been gradually expounded in Sacred Tradition, Sacred Scripture, and the Church’s living Magisterium. With the second, theology seeks to respond through speculative enquiry to the specific demands of disciplined thought.”

– Complete a writing assignment which follows the method proposed above by Pope St.John Paul II. – Begin with the first methodological principle: a hearing of revelation (auditus fidei).

– Step one: choose a revealed truth or truths from divine revelation suitable for this assignment. This truth should be clearly attested to by Tradition, Sacred Scripture, and or the Church’s living Magisterium. (Purpose of this assignment: attain a deeper insight, the truth or truths should in some way be mysterious or puzzling, either in itself or in relation to other catholic teachings or known realities.)

– Step two: show where this truth is found in Scripture, Tradition, or Church’s magisterial teaching. You should cite at least one authoritative source of Church teaching, such as an official catechism, a document of an ecumenical council, or a papal encyclical.

– Once the data of Revelation has been established, the assignment progresses to the next methodological principle: a theological consideration of the teaching (intellectus fidei).

– Step three: formulate a question which expresses clearly what about the teaching is puzzling.

– Step four: present the position of a theologian or theologians who have addressed this issue. Des any theologian have an insight which can help to resolve what is puzzling?

– Step five: give an analysis. Analyze the issue based on what has been discovered, expressing the precise nature of any difficulty with the teaching and what possibilities for a solution have emerged, if any. What seems clearer after the study? What still seems unresolved?

Requirements: writing conventions, including footnotes and bibliography, should follow Chicago style.

– A minimum of three sources of Catholic teaching. These can be found in Scripture, Sacred Tradition, and or Magisterial teaching. Some magisterial teaching of the church must be included, whether this teaching is found in an official Catechism (e.g. The catechism of the Catholic Church, the catechism of the council of Trent), the teaching of an Ecumencial Council (e.g. The Documents of the Second Vatican Council), or a teaching in an authoritative papal document, such as encyclical (e.g. Fides et Ratio)

– A minimum of two theological sources. This insight should be in harmony with the Church’s understanding of Revelation. Such as doctors of the Church or saints A good example for this paper could be spiritual creatures linking angels and Demons. You may write on any topic, just an example!

how will you go about answering the key research questions?

I need your help to prepare a research proposal (2000 words without references) and the topic is energy efficiency.(engineering subject) I’ve written about 800 words and need to rewrite. attached All the references that you need to write the introduction (the first 10 PDF files) and the literature review ( the rest of PDF files) attached The proposal MUST include the following: 1. Research problem: this should clearly identify the research context, emphasising the currency of the problem. This should also contain a high-level research aim. 2. Literature review: this is a salient review of the literature that clearly makes an argument that justifies the need to examine your chosen research problem. The review should draw upon key sources that inspire your thinking and identify which seminal work you will be building on for the PhD. The review should also ‘conclude’ with a set of objectives that would help deliver your high-level aim in (1), as well as the key research questions. 3. Indicative methods: how will you go about answering the key research questions? What kinds of data sources will you rely on? What will be your data collection and analytical strategy? 4. Possible outcomes and impacts: who are the intended beneficiaries, in terms of research, policy and practice? How will you go about ensuring the impacts of research throughout your project? You can think of the following: high-impact publications, engagement activities with policy and practice stakeholders, teaching etc. I look forward to receiving your proposal for review and consideration.

How do you validate your work?

propose 3 implementable (value added) Ph.D. ideas for a thesis proposal which can be important and applied cross similar sectors or different sectors (profitgovernmentnon-profit organization) in the field of Portfolio and risk management (maybe from governance perspective) mindset that can affect the organizations performance and its strategy.

As a part of the proposal, these ideas must answer the following questions (please clearly number the answers)

1- What is the new hypothesis or school of thought new knowledge you are going to create?

2- Why do you think it is important?

3- How do you verify that what you have done is correct representative?

4- How do you validate your work?

Define multiple possible realities that might be constructed by different individuals for your problem?

  1. Selecting quantitative and/or qualitative approach(s)

In the second part of your second assignment, you select a quantitative and/or qualitative approach(s) for your research problem chosen in assignment 1. Rather than forming a preconception of the type of research methodology required for the problem, we consider the broadest range of options for the problem. Note that your specific research question may be only quantitative or qualitative or it may have both quantitative and qualitative components. Your answers for this section should not be less than 200 words!

 

  • Selecting a quantitative approach

For each of the following questions, based on the problem statement developed in assignment/tutorial 1, develop a brief written answer. These questions are all relate to characteristics typical of a problem requiring a quantitative methodology.

 

  1. Define an objective reality that can be measured for your problem?
  2. Describe how your research question (problem) is confirmatory/predictive?
  3. Give evidence that the available literature for your problem is large?
  4. Describe how your research does not need an in-depth study?
  5. Describe constraints that make it difficult to work with people (as subjects) on this problem?
  6. Describe factors that might dictate a high level of structure in this research?

  • Selecting a qualitative approach

For each of the following questions, based on the problem statement developed in tutorial 1, write a brief answer. These questions are all relate to characteristics typical of a problem requiring a qualitative methodology.

 

  1. Define multiple possible realities that might be constructed by different individuals for your problem?
  2. Describe how your research question (problem) is exploratory/interpretive?
  3. Give evidence that the available literature for your problem is limited?
  4. Describe how your research focus requires in-depth study?
  5. Describe factors that make it easy/feasible to work with people (as subjects) on this problem?
  6. Describe factors that might dictate a low level of structure in this research?
Considering your answers given to the questions in the subsection 2.1 and 2.2, do you think your research topic requires a quantitative or qualitative methodology or both?

Explain the common causes of in-service failure for products or structures produced from each or a combination of the four categories of engineering materials

Case Study: Select one of the following products to carry out a case study throughout this assignment:

 

  1. F1 car body panel
  2. Solar panel used in satellite
  3. Gas turbine blades
  4. Cryogenic tank

 

Learning Outcomes 3.1

3.1: Analyse the function(s) of a product in terms of the materials’ constraints on its design

 

  1. Analyse the function(s) of the product in terms of the constraints on the design of the product.

 

  1. Stress imposed
  2. Environment
  3. Material properties required
  4. Design factors

(Maximum length 400 words)

 

Learning Outcomes 3.2

3.2: Identify the required properties for the product and select the most appropriate materials and processing methods

 

  1. For the Chosen product, identify appropriate materials used for its manufacture and the appropriate mechanical and thermal properties of these materials and discuss them in details.

(Maximum length 400 words)

 

  1. Identify and discuss three of the appropriate processes used in the manufacture of the chosen product.

(Maximum length 400 words)

 

 

Learning Outcomes 3.3

3.3: Identify and explain the possible limitations on the product imposed by the processing and by the need to safeguard the environment and minimise costs

 

  1. Manufacturing processes may impose limitation on the manufactured product. List the main possible limitations and choose three from the list to discuss their influence on the function of the product and suggest ways to safeguard environment and minimise costs.

(Maximum length 400 words)

Learning Outcome 4.1

4.1: Explain the common causes of in-service failure for products or structures produced from each or a combination of the four categories of engineering materials

 

  1. Choose one product or a structure made from any one of the four categories of materials (metal, ceramic, polymer or composite) or in combination and examine and discuss three of the most common causes of its failure such as wear and tear, creep, fatigue, impact, overstressing, corrosion, temperature, thermal cycling, residual stresses, stress relaxation, degradation, radiation or electrical breakdown.

(Maximum length 300 words)

 

 

Learning Outcome 4.2

4.2: For one product or material structure, identify and explain the in-service conditions that may contribute to early failure

 

  1. Identify and discuss the in-service conditions that may contribute to the early failure of the product or the structure chosen.

(Maximum length 300 words)

 

 

 

Learning Outcomes 4.3

4.3: Explain the methods for investigating materials failure and for estimating product service life, when a product is subject to creep and fatigue loading

 

  1. Identify three main causes of service failure for the chosen product and discuss each in detail.

(Maximum length 300 words)

 

  1. For the chosen product explain how its service life can be estimated when it is subject to creep and fatigue loading.

(Maximum length 300 words)

 

 

Learning Outcomes 4.4

4.4: Determine and make recommendations for remedial/preventative measures for a given product or materials structure that will help improve its service life

 

  1. For the chosen product suggest three ways of improving it’s service life and discuss the measures that need taking in order to overcome the causes of service failure.
(Maximum length 450 words)

Product Target Strategy Planning Positioning and Brand

Identify your target market and what segmentation criteria you use to identify it.
Purpose of Assignment
Marketing plans help coordinate an organization’s departments and activities toward a mutual benefit between the organization and the consumer. Well thought out marketing plans contain both internal and external research aimed at understanding who the customer is, what they want, and any barriers the company may encounter in meeting customer demands. This research and information allows the company to create strong strategies and realistic goals. Part 1 of this two-part learning team assignment is designed to place students in the role of a company marketing team demonstrating to the CEO and Stakeholders why and how their new product/service should be launched. This assignment assesses the company, the target market and product, and identifies potential obstacles a company may face when deciding to launch a new offering will be identified.
Assignment Steps
Resources: Marketing: Ch. 1: pg. 4-10; Ch. 2: pg. 40-46 and 54-69; Ch. 3: pg. 72-92; Ch. 11: pg. 292-309; Week 1 video
Scenario: Your team has been chosen by the CEO to lead the development of key marketing strategies for the marketing plan for your company’s launch of a new and unique product/service (not already offered). Your marketing team’s mission is to prove to the board of directors and investors through research, strategy development, and reasoning, that this product/service is viable and will meet the company’s goals. In this first half of the project, you will be reporting to the board and CEO about the target, the product’s strengths, a SWOTT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats and Trends) analysis, and the brand’s position in the competitive environment.
Create a company name and decide what real business world industry it operates in.
Create a new and unique (not already offered) product or service the company will be launching.

Critically evaluate a solution considering the concept of learning organisations as protection against changes in the external environment

1) The Assessment – Develop a portfolio/Essay of 8000 words relating to workplace problem-solving activity that demonstrates learning outcomes for the module. (Note: The total words are 10,000 word without inclusion of the references and bibliography, however I want to add my own 2000 words into this assignment) hence I just need 8000 words.

English UK

Critical evaluation of number of innovative and unusual models of problem solving method as listed below, but not all…

a) critically evaluate a number of innovative and unusual models of problem solving normally used in other unrelated organisational contexts
b) identify a complex problem with unpredictable and unknown features associated with new or previously unrecognised or unadvised goals
c) analyse a problem using additional, unconventional or original methodological tools
d) identify and evaluate one or more solutions and assess the constraints in terms of the unpredictable features that relate to managing innovation
e) develop and implement an implementation plan that addresses the nature of an innovatory change and associated unpredictability
f) Critically evaluate a solution considering the concept of learning organisations as protection against changes in the external environment
g) identify and reflect on the underlying values and beliefs of key decision-makers and their impact on the problem-solving process
h) identify the ethical issues associated with problem solving in the workplace
i) reflect on their thinking and decision-making strategies throughout the problem-solving activity
j) understand the links and differences between management and leadership within the context of organisational achievement, value and success.
Structure and content of the module:
The module learning is structured around five main areas or themes:
Theme A Approaches to problem solving
Theme B Working on a real life problem
Theme C Evaluating progress and dealing with operational issues
Theme D Values and ethical issues
Theme E Review of learning

Show that lessons learnt from the incident or disaster can help to prevent similar failures from happening again.

This case study is prepared for my exam question one which worth 30 marks. The minimum word count is 300.
We can choose our own case study. EXCEPT (UK flash flooding and the Pitt Review, and the Cumbria flash flooding of 2009, Herald of Free Enterprise at Zeebrugge, Belgium
(1987) or M/A Estonia ferry in Baltic sea
(1994), and how RORO sinkings changed regulations for safety on sea, I-35W road bridge collapse, over the Mississippi river at
Minneapolis in USA, in 2007, Japanese 9.0 earthquake and the Fukushima nuclear plant
disaster, 2011, Concorde crash at Paris on 25 July 2000 and foreign object damage.) We have done these case study before so we can not use these in exam.
The question 1 is:

For the case study of your choice write an article for the lay-person reader covering the
following three learning outcomes:
• Show that lessons learnt from the incident or disaster can help to prevent similar
failures from happening again.
• Show that the root cause(s) to the incident or disaster is/are linked to the
management of safety by way of one of the three topics of structural reliability,
risk assessment or limit state design.
• Introduce the types of organisation and/or independent body who review and
monitor matters relating to the safety of the industrial sector.